WWII Decisions Online · The Route of the Worst Journey in the World
Filter by theme: 19
Filter by location 1008
Filter by location:
View full list

The Route of the Worst Journey in the World

Admiral Sir Dudley Pound, First Sea Lord

Admiral Sir faces the winter of 1942 with an impossible equation. is demanding steel, aircraft and tanks in increasingly urgent telegrams: the Red Army is bleeding on the Eastern Front, and only a steady flow of Western materiel can keep it in the fight. The fastest route runs along the coast of occupied Norway to and , but that passage crosses one of the most lethal stretches of ocean on earth — near-permanent polar night, blizzards, drifting ice that tears through hulls, and an enemy threat that presses from the Norwegian fjords every mile of the way: U-boats lurking beneath black water, Heinkel and Junkers bombers within range for the entire crossing.

Pound knows the losses will be severe. His officers place several courses before him: maintain regular convoys to the USSR despite the foreseeable sinkings, because the political alliance with cannot afford silence; suspend the Arctic route and divert aid through Persia or Vladivostok, far safer but so much slower that the front might collapse before the first cargoes arrive; or send only isolated fast convoys without heavy escort, gambling on speed rather than protection.

Behind each option lies a brutal arithmetic: British and American sailors weighed against Soviet time. presses, Roosevelt insists, and does not ask — he demands. Pound must decide whether Allied solidarity is worth the blood it will cost in Arctic waters.

Barents Sea, January 1942, First Sea Lord: how far can the Admiralty expose its convoys to destruction to hold the alliance with Stalin together?

View full list

Learn more about this event

📄 Articles Google search 🖼 Images Google Images Videos Google Videos 📍 Map Google Maps
T10-039

Report an error

Saw something wrong on this page? Tell us — we will fix it.

Page reference: