The Route of the Worst Journey in the World
Admiral Sir faces the winter of 1942 with an impossible equation. is demanding steel, aircraft and tanks in increasingly urgent telegrams: the Red Army is bleeding on the Eastern Front, and only a steady flow of Western materiel can keep it in the fight. The fastest route runs along the coast of occupied Norway to and , but that passage crosses one of the most lethal stretches of ocean on earth — near-permanent polar night, blizzards, drifting ice that tears through hulls, and an enemy threat that presses from the Norwegian fjords every mile of the way: U-boats lurking beneath black water, Heinkel and Junkers bombers within range for the entire crossing.
Pound knows the losses will be severe. His officers place several courses before him: maintain regular convoys to the USSR despite the foreseeable sinkings, because the political alliance with cannot afford silence; suspend the Arctic route and divert aid through Persia or Vladivostok, far safer but so much slower that the front might collapse before the first cargoes arrive; or send only isolated fast convoys without heavy escort, gambling on speed rather than protection.
Behind each option lies a brutal arithmetic: British and American sailors weighed against Soviet time. presses, Roosevelt insists, and does not ask — he demands. Pound must decide whether Allied solidarity is worth the blood it will cost in Arctic waters.
Barents Sea, January 1942, First Sea Lord: how far can the Admiralty expose its convoys to destruction to hold the alliance with Stalin together?
Pound and the Admiralty maintain the Arctic convoys as a vital political lifeline to the USSR. In July 1942, convoy , scattered on Pound's direct order out of fear of the , is annihilated: 24 of 35 ships sunk. Yet over the course of 1942-1945, millions of tons of supplies reach the Soviet Union. gave the route the name that would endure: the worst journey in the world.
Learn more about this event
T10-039