WWII Decisions Online · The Manstein Plan Under Debate
Filter by theme: 18
Filter by location 958
Filter by location:
View full list
Europe🇩🇪 DEStrategyOffensiveAxis

The Manstein Plan Under Debate

Erich von Manstein and the German high command

At the start of 1940, the plan for the offensive in the West ("Fall Gelb") remained, in its first version, a variant of the 1914 attack: the main effort came through the plain of Belgium. Many generals judged it predictable and not decisive. General , chief of staff of , defended a bold and risky idea: to direct the main effort through the Ardennes, a wooded massif reputed impassable for armour, in order to break through at Sedan and drive towards the Channel, taking from the rear the Allied armies that had entered Belgium.

Manstein's plan ("Sichelschnitt", the sickle cut) was brilliant but perilous: should the armour become bogged down in the Ardennes, or should the Allies react quickly, it would be a catastrophe. The cautious hierarchy hesitated to overturn its plans for so hazardous a gamble.

The high command had to decide. To adopt the Manstein plan and its Ardennes gamble. To keep the classic plan through Belgium, safer but without the element of surprise. Or to seek a compromise distributing the effort. The arbitration would rise to the very summit of the Reich, where the decision would be settled. Which option should the OKH choose?

Heading the German high command, February 1940: should you gamble on Manstein's Ardennes breakthrough?

View full list

Learn more about this event

📄 Articles Google search 🖼 Images Google Images Videos Google Videos 📍 Map Google Maps
T02-092

Report an error

Saw something wrong on this page? Tell us — we will fix it.

Page reference: