Under occupation, information is locked down: a censored press, the "stolen press", omnipresent propaganda. The only window onto another truth is the radio — in particular the BBC, which broadcasts news and messages in French and Dutch for the occupied countries. But listening to "enemy" radio is progressively forbidden and punished by the occupier.
For you, the wireless set becomes an object of temptation and of risk. To listen to London in secret, in the evening, with the volume turned down, in order to know the real course of the war and keep hope alive — at the risk of denunciation and sanctions. To abstain out of caution, making do with the authorised information. Or to listen and spread what you hear, passing the news around you, which multiplies the danger.
The stakes may seem minor, but they are real: to master information is to resist the occupier's psychological grip. Listening to the BBC will become one of the most widespread acts of disobedience of the occupation, and the rumour of the news from London a powerful support to morale.
Should our listener listen to London in secret, abstain out of caution, or listen and spread the news?
Millions of people, throughout occupied Europe, choose A (and many C): despite the bans and the penalties, clandestine listening to the BBC becomes widespread and turns into a ritual of moral resistance, sustaining hope and countering propaganda. In time, the occupier will attempt to confiscate radio sets in order to break this "counter-information". The news from London, passed on by word of mouth, and the BBC's coded messages will play a major role in maintaining morale and, later, in liaison with the Resistance. Listening to London, a seemingly innocuous gesture, was one of the most universal forms of refusal of the occupation.









