WWII Decisions Online · Neutral Belgium — let the Allies in?
Filter by theme: 18
Filter by location 927
Filter by location:
View full list
January – February 1940
Brussels, Belgium
Europe🇧🇪 BEPoliticsStrategyAllies

Neutral Belgium — let the Allies in?

Léopold III and the Belgian government

Since 1936, Belgium had pursued a "policy of independence", keeping its distance from the great powers and refusing any formal military commitment with France and the United Kingdom. But in the winter of 1939–1940, the German threat became more definite, and the Mechelen incident confirmed that an offensive would pass through Belgian territory.

The dilemma became pressing. Authorising the Franco-British armies to enter Belgium pre-emptively would allow a defence in depth to be organised before the attack, but would break neutrality and perhaps furnish Hitler with the pretext he was seeking. To refuse this was to rely on a defence improvised at the last moment, with the Allies able to rush in only once the invasion had begun.

and his government had to choose. Let the Allies in ahead of time to prepare a joint defence. Hold a strict line, calling on the Allies only after an actual aggression. Or negotiate secret cooperation plans without public commitment. The whole balance of Belgian security — and the fate of the coming battle — turned on this judgement.

Should Belgium let the Allies in ahead of time, remain strictly neutral, or prepare secret plans?

View full list

Learn more about this event

📄 Articles Google search 🖼 Images Google Images Videos Google Videos 📍 Map Google Maps

Report an error

Saw something wrong on this page? Tell us — we will fix it.

Page reference: