With the occupation, the movements that advocate collaboration with Germany emerge strengthened. In Flanders, the VNV (Vlaams Nationaal Verbond), Flemish nationalist, hopes to obtain Flemish autonomy or independence from the occupier. In Wallonia and Brussels, 's Rex movement, hesitant at first, slides towards an increasingly open collaboration. Both promise order, careers and a place in the "new European order".
For you, won over or opportunistic, the temptation arises. To join one of these movements, out of conviction, ambition or to benefit from the occupier's favours. To stay clear of any commitment, in cautious neutrality. Or to oppose them openly, at the risk of reprisals.
The stakes are moral as much as political: to choose collaboration is to bet on a German victory and to place oneself on the side of the occupier; to abstain is to wait, sometimes out of calculation, sometimes out of patriotism. In the summer of 1940, the future appears sealed in Germany's favour, which makes the collaborationist temptation all the stronger.
Should our young Belgian join the VNV or Rex, stay clear, or oppose them?
The vast majority keeps to B (cautious wait-and-see), but an active minority chooses A: the VNV and, later, Rex provide the occupier with cadres, administrators, and then volunteers for the Eastern Front (the , the ). The occupier at first favours the VNV (within the framework of the Flamenpolitik) before also relying on Rex. This political collaboration, a minority but real, will lead to a growing hold of these movements over the administration from 1941, and to a severe repression at the Liberation. The choice of 1940, made when Germany seemed invincible, will be heavy with consequences for those who committed to it.









