The armistice of Rethondes
On 22 June 1940, the French delegation came to sign the armistice requested by Pétain. Hitler had chosen its setting and staging with vengeful care: the clearing of Rethondes, near Compiègne, and the very railway carriage in which Germany had signed its defeat in November 1918. The symbolism was overwhelming: to erase the humiliation of 1918 by imposing it on France in the same place.
The German conditions were harsh: occupation of two-thirds of the country (the entire Atlantic seaboard and the north), demobilisation of the army, surrender of German political refugees, exorbitant occupation costs, retention of the prisoners of war. The French delegation had virtually no room for manoeuvre.
The delegation could sign the conditions imposed, in order to halt the fighting and preserve a "free" zone and the empire. Refuse and break off negotiations, which would reignite a war already lost on national soil. Or contest certain clauses point by point (the fleet, the empire, the prisoners) in the hope of concessions. The aim was to limit the damage of a total defeat.
Should the French delegation sign the armistice, refuse it, or attempt to negotiate the clauses?
The delegation chose A, with a few attempts at C: the armistice was signed on 22 June 1940 at Rethondes, in the 1918 carriage, after which Hitler ordered the site destroyed to erase the symbol of the German defeat. France was cut into an occupied zone and a "free" zone, its army reduced, its fleet neutralised (a clause that would lead to the tragedy of Mers-el-Kébir), its prisoners retained. The armistice put an end to the fighting but opened the period of Vichy, of occupation and of collaboration. The staging at Rethondes would remain one of the most powerful symbols of French humiliation and of the momentary triumph of the Third Reich in the West.









