The collapse of the 9th Army
General 's holds the Meuse sector between Sedan and Dinant — precisely where the German bridgeheads (Guderian, Reinhardt, Rommel) have just been established. Made up in part of second-rate reserve units, stretched across a wide front believed to be little threatened, it is struck head-on by the breakthrough.
Under the combined blows of the armour and the Luftwaffe, the front falls apart. Corap must react quickly. Attempt a general counter-attack to reduce the bridgeheads before they merge. Order a general withdrawal to reconstitute a line further back. Or hold in place, plugging the breaches one by one.
Time is working against him: with every hour, the Panzers widen the breaches and drive deeper. A decision that is too slow or poorly executed would turn the local rupture into the rout of an entire army, opening the road to the Channel. Corap has few mobile reserves and only fragmentary information about the true scale of the breakthrough.
Should Corap counter-attack the bridgeheads, order a general withdrawal, or hold in place by plugging the breaches?
For want of reserves and faced with the speed of the breakthrough, the slides towards B in disorder: the withdrawal, poorly coordinated and hastened by the German advance, turns into collapse. Within a few days, the ceases to exist as an organised force, opening a gaping breach through which the armour races westward. Corap is dismissed as early as 15 May and replaced by Giraud (himself soon captured). The collapse of the , a poorly equipped force placed on the most dangerous axis, is one of the turning points of the campaign: it transforms the Meuse breakthrough into an irretrievable strategic rupture. Corap would serve as the scapegoat for a disaster with far deeper causes.









