After the crushing of Poland (1939) and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia (1938–1939), tens of thousands of Polish and Czechoslovak servicemen had fled to France to continue the fight. Their governments in exile (Sikorski for Poland, Beneš for Czechoslovakia) organised themselves on French soil and sought to give these men a future.
These men, who had already lost everything, faced a choice of commitment. To reconstitute units and fight alongside the French, despite the makeshift equipment and the uncertainty. To wait for better organisation before committing. Or, for some, to seek to reach other theatres (the Middle East, the United Kingdom).
For the Allies, these foreign forces represented a potential reinforcement and a symbol: the war of the occupied nations could continue from exile. But their employment raised questions of command, equipment and morale. Many burned to fight the occupier of their homeland; France offered them a base. What were these soldiers without a country to decide?
Should the Polish and Czech servicemen reconstitute units and fight in France, wait, or reach other theatres?
They overwhelmingly chose A: as early as the winter of 1939–1940, Poles and Czechoslovaks reconstituted significant forces in France (the Polish army in France would number several tens of thousands of men) which would fight in the 1940 campaign (notably in Norway at Narvik, and on the French front). After the defeat, many evacuated to the United Kingdom (C) to continue the struggle: the Polish pilots would distinguish themselves in the Battle of Britain, and the Czech and Polish units would serve through to the victory. The commitment of these exiles, fighting to liberate their occupied homeland, illustrates the international dimension of resistance to the Axis from as early as 1939–1940 — and the role of France, and then of England, as a base for the war of the free nations.









